|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
19/01/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/02/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
CASTRO, J. A.; OLIVEIRA, E. J. de; JESUS, O. N. de; SOARES, T. L.; MARGARIDO, G. R. A. |
Afiliação: |
J. A. CASTRO, UFRB; EDER JORGE DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMF; ONILDO NUNES DE JESUS, CNPMF; T. L. SOARES; G. R. A. MARGARIDO, ESALQ. |
Título: |
Molecular markers for conservation genetic resources of fourPassiflora species. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Scientia Horticulturae, v., 212, p. 251-261, 2016. |
ISSN: |
0304-4238 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
tThe aim of this study was to use microsatellite markers (SSR) for the characterization of the Passifloraspecies and to verify the effect of random selection of individuals in parameters that characterize thegenetic variability of germplasm for conservation purposes. Four species, Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpaDegener, P. cincinnata Mast., P. alata Curtis and P. setacea D.C., were evaluated. For each species tworandom samples were evaluated, one consisting of 60 plants (S60) and the other of 10 plants (S10)randomly selected from the S60. Initially, the S10 and S60 were used to calculate the genetic parametersof number of alleles, expected and observed heterozygosity, effective population size, inbreeding andpolymorphic information content based on 40 microsatellite markers developed for P. edulis and 20 for P.alata. Further bootstrap analysis was performed to identify the minimum number of individuals neededto represent the variability of each Passiflora species from a range of 2 to 59. The number of polymorphicmicrosatellites was 15, 9, 6 and 2 on P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. cincinnata, P. alata and P. setacea, respectively.The allelic loss due to the under-representation of the samples was 19 (30%), 16 (43%) and nine (39%)alleles, respectively, for P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. cincinnata and P. alata. No allelic loss was observed forP. setacea, probably because only two polymorphic microsatellites were identified. In general, there aredifferences between S10 and S60 because of lost genetic variability on S10, indicating that the use of these10 individuals to represent the Passiflora species is insufficient for long-term preservation. In contrast,the bootstrap analysis revealed that the stability of the genetic parameters due to the increase in samplesize was close to 30, 23, 25 and 24 individuals for P. cincinnata, P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. setacea and P. alata,respectively. The difference of genetic estimates between samples S10 and S60 demonstrated that 23?30individuals are the minimum range of population to represent the Passiflora species studied. This studymay optimize the strategies for conservation the Passiflora germplasm avoiding the under-representationof samples and consequent loss of genetic variability during sexual propagation. MenostThe aim of this study was to use microsatellite markers (SSR) for the characterization of the Passifloraspecies and to verify the effect of random selection of individuals in parameters that characterize thegenetic variability of germplasm for conservation purposes. Four species, Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpaDegener, P. cincinnata Mast., P. alata Curtis and P. setacea D.C., were evaluated. For each species tworandom samples were evaluated, one consisting of 60 plants (S60) and the other of 10 plants (S10)randomly selected from the S60. Initially, the S10 and S60 were used to calculate the genetic parametersof number of alleles, expected and observed heterozygosity, effective population size, inbreeding andpolymorphic information content based on 40 microsatellite markers developed for P. edulis and 20 for P.alata. Further bootstrap analysis was performed to identify the minimum number of individuals neededto represent the variability of each Passiflora species from a range of 2 to 59. The number of polymorphicmicrosatellites was 15, 9, 6 and 2 on P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. cincinnata, P. alata and P. setacea, respectively.The allelic loss due to the under-representation of the samples was 19 (30%), 16 (43%) and nine (39%)alleles, respectively, for P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. cincinnata and P. alata. No allelic loss was observed forP. setacea, probably because only two polymorphic microsatellites were identified. In general, there aredifferences between S10 and S60 becaus... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Passionfruit. |
Thesagro: |
Maracujá. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02875naa a2200205 a 4500 001 2061183 005 2017-02-08 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0304-4238 100 1 $aCASTRO, J. A. 245 $aMolecular markers for conservation genetic resources of fourPassiflora species.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $atThe aim of this study was to use microsatellite markers (SSR) for the characterization of the Passifloraspecies and to verify the effect of random selection of individuals in parameters that characterize thegenetic variability of germplasm for conservation purposes. Four species, Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpaDegener, P. cincinnata Mast., P. alata Curtis and P. setacea D.C., were evaluated. For each species tworandom samples were evaluated, one consisting of 60 plants (S60) and the other of 10 plants (S10)randomly selected from the S60. Initially, the S10 and S60 were used to calculate the genetic parametersof number of alleles, expected and observed heterozygosity, effective population size, inbreeding andpolymorphic information content based on 40 microsatellite markers developed for P. edulis and 20 for P.alata. Further bootstrap analysis was performed to identify the minimum number of individuals neededto represent the variability of each Passiflora species from a range of 2 to 59. The number of polymorphicmicrosatellites was 15, 9, 6 and 2 on P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. cincinnata, P. alata and P. setacea, respectively.The allelic loss due to the under-representation of the samples was 19 (30%), 16 (43%) and nine (39%)alleles, respectively, for P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. cincinnata and P. alata. No allelic loss was observed forP. setacea, probably because only two polymorphic microsatellites were identified. In general, there aredifferences between S10 and S60 because of lost genetic variability on S10, indicating that the use of these10 individuals to represent the Passiflora species is insufficient for long-term preservation. In contrast,the bootstrap analysis revealed that the stability of the genetic parameters due to the increase in samplesize was close to 30, 23, 25 and 24 individuals for P. cincinnata, P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. setacea and P. alata,respectively. The difference of genetic estimates between samples S10 and S60 demonstrated that 23?30individuals are the minimum range of population to represent the Passiflora species studied. This studymay optimize the strategies for conservation the Passiflora germplasm avoiding the under-representationof samples and consequent loss of genetic variability during sexual propagation. 650 $aMaracujá 653 $aPassionfruit 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, E. J. de 700 1 $aJESUS, O. N. de 700 1 $aSOARES, T. L. 700 1 $aMARGARIDO, G. R. A. 773 $tScientia Horticulturae$gv., 212, p. 251-261, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
Data corrente: |
28/01/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
28/01/2016 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
SANTANA NETO, J. A.; MUNIZ, E. N.; SANTOS, G. R. de A.; RANGEL, J. H. de A.; CASTRO FILHO, E. S. |
Afiliação: |
JOSE ADELSON SANTANA NETO; EVANDRO NEVES MUNIZ, CPATC; GLADSTON RAFAEL DE ARRUDA SANTOS; JOSE HENRIQUE DE ALBUQUERQUE RANGEL, CPATC; EDIVILSON SILVA CASTRO FILHO. |
Título: |
Digestibility of nutrients in sheep diets with different levels of manipueira. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESSO DE LA ASOCIACION LATINO AMERICANA DE PRODUCCION ANIMAL, 24.; CONGRESO DE LA SOCIEDAD CHILENA DE PRODUCTION ANIMAL SOCHIPA A. G., 2015, Puerto Varas. anales... Puerto Varas: ALPA: SOCHIPA A. G., 2015. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Thesagro: |
Manipueira; Ovelha. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Sheep. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/138022/1/Ev3.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00714nam a2200181 a 4500 001 2035533 005 2016-01-28 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSANTANA NETO, J. A. 245 $aDigestibility of nutrients in sheep diets with different levels of manipueira.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: CONGRESSO DE LA ASOCIACION LATINO AMERICANA DE PRODUCCION ANIMAL, 24.; CONGRESO DE LA SOCIEDAD CHILENA DE PRODUCTION ANIMAL SOCHIPA A. G., 2015, Puerto Varas. anales... Puerto Varas: ALPA: SOCHIPA A. G.$c2015 650 $aSheep 650 $aManipueira 650 $aOvelha 700 1 $aMUNIZ, E. N. 700 1 $aSANTOS, G. R. de A. 700 1 $aRANGEL, J. H. de A. 700 1 $aCASTRO FILHO, E. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros (CPATC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|